THE CHINESE ARE TAKING A BIG LEAP ON QUANTUM COMMUNICATION
Well, in keeping with what I promised late last week, we
will begin our discussion on the fundamentals of quantum mechanics, the basis
upon which the Chinese new hi-tech satellite was launched.
Let me start by giving you are overview of what we have
before this advent.
FREE TUTORIAL ON CLASSICAL MECHANICS
The fundamental basis of what we know as classical mechanics was laid
out by Isaac Newton in 1687, when he stated the popular well know formula F=ma.
Newton you remember was the scientist who stated that action and reaction are
equal and opposite.
The three laws of motion were first compiled by Isaac Newton
in his PhilosophiƦ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (Mathematical Principles of
Natural Philosophy), first published in 1687
He is known as the undisputed father of classical mechanics.
He stated the following laws:
First law: When
viewed in an inertial reference frame, an object either remains at rest or
continues to move at a constant velocity, unless acted upon by a net force.
Second law: In
an inertial reference frame, the vector sum of the forces F on an object is
equal to the mass m of that object multiplied by the acceleration vector (a) of
the object: F = ma.
Third law: When
one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts
a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body.
Almost everything you see today made by man in engineering
including but not limited to our cars, airplanes, rocket propulsion, buildings
were all based on Newton’s fundamental principles of classical mechanics. He
helped us to understand issues as gravity, the rotation of the earth around the
sun, even as far as most of what you know today about distance stars etc. Even
our present communication networks were all products of the classical
mechanics.
But towards the beginning of the 20th century,
things began to fall apart. Experiments began to reveal flaws in the laws of
classical mechanics. When you narrow things down to atomic-levels, these laws
are not obeyed as laid out. Scientist became confused when the spectra lines of
the hydrogen molecule clearly violated the laws of classical mechanics. This
requires new theories and new explanation of our understanding of nature
itself. It was at this time that a relatively unknown young Austrian Physicist
stepped in, Erwin Schrodinger.
THE SCHRODINGER WAVE EQATION: A FREE OVERVIEW
In 1925 almost after what many thought of as a mental
breakdown, Schrodinger laid out a famous wave equation (I won’t be stating the
equation to make the reading simple but will explain it)
Before Schrodinger, the nature of the universe had been
understood on the basis of the three laws of Newton. But these laws were not
adequate to explain what happens at the atomic levels. While classical
mechanics assumes a continues flow of things, energy, events, etc. It appears
that discontinuities exist at the atomic levels. For example, it was known that
electrons do not assume every available energy in a continuum but there are
jumps or steps now called quanta for which the energy of these electrons can
exist. This appeared very strange. Let me explain it this way: You are climbing
a steep hill, and suddenly discovered that you are not permitted to walk
normally as usual up hill, that the only way to climb this hill is to do some
jumps. If you are not ready for the jumps, you fall of a hole of no return.
LOL! (A very primitive way of describing the observed behavior of electrons
within an atom) So the electrons only occupied steps of energy levels and not
all.
The Schrodinger wave equation itself was a bit strange. It
came from nowhere except from Erwin’s mind. It was not derived, he just stated
it, but again he took into cognizance the works of Max Plank who had already
derived what we call the Plank’s constant, he also borrowed from the Euclidean
space in terms of describing the positions of the quantum particles, but
whatever was going on in his mind, no one knows. What we do know was that his
equation resolved the gaps observed on the hydrogen spectral lines. Bingo!
Schrodinger himself could not give a name to his function
(Which we call phi), asked what it
represents, he said it was a charge density function.
Today we know what it is; it is a distribution probability
function. OK, to make it easy, it is a probability that a quantum particle will
exist in a certain space in certain locations. But you know, scientists don’t
like that. They don’t like probability, they like exactness. So he had real
issues with Professor Albert Einstein on this one.
More confusion was introduced, when these quantum particles
(electrons, protons, atoms, molecules, photons etc.) exhibit a dual existence.
We called that double dealing the wave-particle duality. In simple understanding, usually a body
should be a body. It cannot be a body with a mass and a wave at the same time.
But this knowledge was violated by quantum particles, they can be a particle (a
body with a mass) and a wave ( a massless energy form) simultaneously. LOL! Crazy
isn’t it. Well it exactly happened. Let me shock you with another mystery
surrounding quantum particles. They can exist in many places at the same time.
They exhibit what scientist called a tunnel effect. This ability to exist in
multiple states at the same time is called super-position.
Let me explain it this way; supposing you roll a ball up a
steep-shaped hill, as long as you didn’t throw that ball, it is a common
knowledge that the ball won’t have enough energy to fall over the other side.
When its energy is exhausted it will simply roll back down. Ok, but a quantum
particle behaves differently. Though it does not have much energy, it will
appear on both sides of the hill simultaneously. It will tunnel through. How?
LOL! I don’t know. You know how waves pierce through anything right??
The Other mystery about them is what we call QUANTUM
ENTANGLEMENT. Let’s discuss that tomorrow God willing.
I hope I didn’t bore you with this free tutorials. I have
tried so hard to avoid mathematical formulas.!!!! Enjoy your day.
Nice article and thanks for sharing your knowledge. I really appropriate your views.
ReplyDeleteMarc The Phone Man